<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worthless TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=worthless-tv</link>
	<description>Thought-provoking commentary on life, politics, religion and social issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:27:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-6107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-6107</guid>
		<description>Television in itself is only an appliance, what we choose to do with that applicance is the key.  I know that this is a pretty symantic distinction, but I like thinking of it that way.  
To quote AofF #13 &quot;If there is anything hvirtuous, ilovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.&quot;
So if we use our television to watch General Conference, obviously then television is not worthless.  
There is a saying I have heard that it&#039;s better to have a &quot;Rated R truth than a Rated G lie.&quot; While I think that is oversimplfying things, I think what we choose to watch on TV had better be stand for   something (to quote a now overused
phrase).

PS. My vote is for Arrested Development, although I cant think of what it or According to Jim stand for, but I laugh more watching AD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Television in itself is only an appliance, what we choose to do with that applicance is the key.  I know that this is a pretty symantic distinction, but I like thinking of it that way.<br />
To quote AofF #13 &#8220;If there is anything hvirtuous, ilovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.&#8221;<br />
So if we use our television to watch General Conference, obviously then television is not worthless.<br />
There is a saying I have heard that it&#8217;s better to have a &#8220;Rated R truth than a Rated G lie.&#8221; While I think that is oversimplfying things, I think what we choose to watch on TV had better be stand for   something (to quote a now overused<br />
phrase).</p>
<p>PS. My vote is for Arrested Development, although I cant think of what it or According to Jim stand for, but I laugh more watching AD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-6053</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-6053</guid>
		<description>I think that both Survivor and American Idol are useful in that they are in fact microcosms of western society (and specifically America).

The mediocre and well connected rise to the top. We are not in a meritocracy, it is a popularity contest ... unless you&#039;re the one making the rules (ala Jeff Probst).

Certain people are above the rules (did Paula ever sing off-key?). But for the most part the world is about being more successful than your fellow man, not by actually being better at something - but by manipulating the social environment around you eat your competitors alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that both Survivor and American Idol are useful in that they are in fact microcosms of western society (and specifically America).</p>
<p>The mediocre and well connected rise to the top. We are not in a meritocracy, it is a popularity contest &#8230; unless you&#8217;re the one making the rules (ala Jeff Probst).</p>
<p>Certain people are above the rules (did Paula ever sing off-key?). But for the most part the world is about being more successful than your fellow man, not by actually being better at something &#8211; but by manipulating the social environment around you eat your competitors alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-6025</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-6025</guid>
		<description>My favorite TV shows right now are Lost, American Idol, CSI, Grey&#039;s Anatomy, Scrubs, and House. If I only watch those shows, I will be watching about 7 hours/week (American Idol is usually on twice each week) or one hour per day. Is that excessive? Is it okay to indulge in SOME worthless programming, or are we supposed to watch ONLY uplifting, educational shows?

P.S. I borrowed the first 2 seasons of Arrested Development from my friend and watched every episode. It was hilarious. I also borrowed the first season of 24 and loved it. I can&#039;t wait to borrow the other seasons. (Maybe I should stop watching TV and just buy the DVD sets instead. No commercials and no waiting a week for the next episode.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite TV shows right now are Lost, American Idol, CSI, Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, Scrubs, and House. If I only watch those shows, I will be watching about 7 hours/week (American Idol is usually on twice each week) or one hour per day. Is that excessive? Is it okay to indulge in SOME worthless programming, or are we supposed to watch ONLY uplifting, educational shows?</p>
<p>P.S. I borrowed the first 2 seasons of Arrested Development from my friend and watched every episode. It was hilarious. I also borrowed the first season of 24 and loved it. I can&#8217;t wait to borrow the other seasons. (Maybe I should stop watching TV and just buy the DVD sets instead. No commercials and no waiting a week for the next episode.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ltbugaf</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-6008</link>
		<dc:creator>ltbugaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-6008</guid>
		<description>My feeling about Survivor is mostly visceral, but I&#039;ll try to explain it.  What I loathe and despise about Survivor is that it is based on people placed in difficult or desperate circumstances who, rather than acting like compassionate and civilized humans, are directed to turn on and destroy one another.  In short, it fosters the very worst aspects of human nature and celebrates them.

I think that explains my feeling.  With more thinking time I might be able to articulate it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feeling about Survivor is mostly visceral, but I&#8217;ll try to explain it.  What I loathe and despise about Survivor is that it is based on people placed in difficult or desperate circumstances who, rather than acting like compassionate and civilized humans, are directed to turn on and destroy one another.  In short, it fosters the very worst aspects of human nature and celebrates them.</p>
<p>I think that explains my feeling.  With more thinking time I might be able to articulate it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annegb</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>annegb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-5995</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-5995</guid>
		<description>ltbugaf? What exactly about Survivor turns your stomach? I like watching how week after week people complain how rough it is out there and that they can&#039;t swim or start fires and they are starving etc etc.. makes me wonder what goes through their heads when they are at home applying to go on the next season after watching 10 seasons of it and not realize they will be SURROUNDED by water and have to START fires and do physical stunts.. 

It makes me understand that if I were to apply to be a participant I would make sure I could survive in the wilderness, start a fire with nothing, build a shelter, and swim.. oh wait I can do that already..

speaking of which I better go set my vcr to tape it while I am at Kim&#039;s this week so I don&#039;t miss my quota of worthwhile watching :-&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ltbugaf? What exactly about Survivor turns your stomach? I like watching how week after week people complain how rough it is out there and that they can&#8217;t swim or start fires and they are starving etc etc.. makes me wonder what goes through their heads when they are at home applying to go on the next season after watching 10 seasons of it and not realize they will be SURROUNDED by water and have to START fires and do physical stunts.. </p>
<p>It makes me understand that if I were to apply to be a participant I would make sure I could survive in the wilderness, start a fire with nothing, build a shelter, and swim.. oh wait I can do that already..</p>
<p>speaking of which I better go set my vcr to tape it while I am at Kim&#8217;s this week so I don&#8217;t miss my quota of worthwhile watching :-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-5993</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-5993</guid>
		<description>Rusty, I concur.

The problem with the show was that there was no laugh track to show the average viewer (i.e. an idiot) what was supposed to be funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rusty, I concur.</p>
<p>The problem with the show was that there was no laugh track to show the average viewer (i.e. an idiot) what was supposed to be funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-5991</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-5991</guid>
		<description>Arrested Development was the most worthwhile television in television history. Too bad too many people are watching worthless television like &quot;According to Jim&quot; instead, causing the AD to be cancelled.

Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrested Development was the most worthwhile television in television history. Too bad too many people are watching worthless television like &#8220;According to Jim&#8221; instead, causing the AD to be cancelled.</p>
<p>Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-5969</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-5969</guid>
		<description>Yes, we should avoid worthless television. however, sometimes what seems worthless isn&#039;t. Like Corner Gas. It seems mindless but it&#039;s not, I always feel light hearted after watching it because it makes me laugh. And laughter is good. However, I feel a tad guilty about liking CSI. 

Of course we relaly don&#039;t watch a lot of television anymore. We were watching far too much for awhile (at least I was).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we should avoid worthless television. however, sometimes what seems worthless isn&#8217;t. Like Corner Gas. It seems mindless but it&#8217;s not, I always feel light hearted after watching it because it makes me laugh. And laughter is good. However, I feel a tad guilty about liking CSI. </p>
<p>Of course we relaly don&#8217;t watch a lot of television anymore. We were watching far too much for awhile (at least I was).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/worthless-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourthoughts.ca/2006/03/28/593/#comment-5968</guid>
		<description>Our family will be watching General Conference this weekend on Television, just like always.

I suppose that how much worthless TV you watch is in direct proportion to how many TV channels you subscribe to.  For those of us who don&#039;t subscribe to HBO, Big Love is not a problem, other than it generates some interesting questions amongst my co-workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our family will be watching General Conference this weekend on Television, just like always.</p>
<p>I suppose that how much worthless TV you watch is in direct proportion to how many TV channels you subscribe to.  For those of us who don&#8217;t subscribe to HBO, Big Love is not a problem, other than it generates some interesting questions amongst my co-workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

