Here’s a story about a recent threat to Canadian security that the unarmed Canadian border guard met by…running away.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/01/24/borderguards060124.html

In my view, that’s a strong argument in favor of an armed borde presence.

- He points out that the rate the lowest tax bracket has increased without mentioning whether any of the others went up with it.

- He points out that the the Canada Employment Credit is “potentially abusable” without seeming to notice that virtually every kind of tax provision in existence is “potentially abusable.”

- He points out that the textbook credit doesn’t pay for the full price of one textbook but may not be considering whether it was ever intended to do so, or even conceived as something that would do so.

- Is he shocked that his country might require the protection of its borders by force of arms? (If so, this seems like the kind of thinking that happens only in a nation that sits under the protective umbrella of a benevolent and peaceful superpower. However, that’s really a mischaracterization, because Canada is a full and vigorous participant in North American defense, including overseas efforts to protect world security. And, perhaps I’m interpreting wrong: In this context, “border” as only the southern border with the US, rather than also including the millions of miles of shoreline that form all Canada’s other borders.

- I myself am surprised that the Canadian economy is characterized as “booming hot.” If it’s as tied as I thought it was to the US economy, it’s hard to imagine that being the case. (I’m not saying Kim is wrong, I’m just saying I’m surprised.)