Overlooked Medical Professionals

Patricia Walling is a graduate student working toward her Masters in Conservation Biology. She has professional and volunteer experience in a hospital environment and resides in Washington, USA.

When a patient is healed we tend to give most of the credit to the doctor or surgeon presiding over the case. The reciprocal is also true, as doctors generally bear the brunt of our blame when something goes wrong. However, is this really the way that we should look at the situation? There’s a lot more to medicine than the direct actions of a doctor. They are only a cog in the machine, an important one, but a cog all the same. When a loved one gets better, it’s just as much the result of behind the scenes work by dozens of other trained medical professionals working as lab technicians or in medical transcription. Yet, sadly they go often unnoticed and uncelebrated by us, mostly because we’ve never heard of them.

One part of the hospital staff we almost never see or hear about are the technical professionals who keep the hospital running efficiently. Where would a patient be if a doctor accessed a medical database and found it unavailable, if his or her notes remained locked away in miles of long-winded audio recordings or a prescription was filled with the wrong medication. IT and clerical staff are the oil that keeps the machine that is medical care running smoothly, but they are universally uncelebrated and their work marginalized. The only time you will see them on television is when they’ve caused a problem or in some way flummoxed a doctor. Though they are vital to patient care, lab technicians, pharmacists and medical transcriptionists are invisible to those they’ve helped save.

While this is particularly true of the technical staff, the shroud of obscurity hangs almost equally over the efforts of menial hospital workers. The kitchen, janitorial and housekeeping staffs are responsible for maintaining the healthy environment of a hospital. Without their contribution there would be no sterile operating theaters, healthy meals or clean beds; hospitals would begin to less resemble institutions of medicine, but rather 19th century sanatoriums.

Cooks and dieticians have it especially rough, as they must operate with severely thin budgets and yet manage to provide patients with diets that offer solid nutrition, can be eaten by those laboring under a weak constitution and conform to the specific dietary needs of patients—giving strict observation to allergies and conditions. These people are repaid with clearly undeserved slander: hospital food has an undeserved reputation for being inedible and disgusting without consideration for any of the facts.

Perhaps less ignored, but still under-appreciated are nurses, anesthetists and emergency medical technicians (EMTs). When the call button is pressed, it’s a nurse that answers it. When a surgeon is operating, an anesthetist is administering the medications to keep the patient unconscious and pain-free. When a patient emergency occurs, EMTs are the ones on the scene at a moment’s notice. Doctors are very busy and can’t be everywhere, and not all are trained to deal with a patient’s moment-to-moment needs: if the staff waited for the attending physician to arrive every time a crisis occurred there would be no time for him to do his job.

Doctors are the most important players in most people’s medical treatment, and they certainly deserve to be lauded. However, It’s plainly obvious that accolades are given in a less than egalitarian way; a myriad of other people play integral parts in hospital workings and personal healthcare. Wouldn’t the right thing to do be to spread our joy to the other members of the team?

Popularity: 1% [?]

GD Lesson 33 Planning

This guest post is provided to you by Bill Atkinson from Gospel Doctrine class for Youth. If you’d like to be a guest poster on Our Thoughts, email us at ourthoughts@gmail.com.

Since I tend to organize my lessons with the youth around reading and discussing the scriptures as much as possible this turns out to be a very difficult lesson to approach. We have one scriptural notation: D&C 107:22–24, which outlines the quorum of the First Presidency and quorum of the 12 and that they have equal authority. Not much to work with even with only 40 minutes.

I think the lesson will be developed around these three ideas:

  1. What was involved in the succession crisis
  2. The Nauvoo Temple experience.
  3. The ongoing persecution, driving out into the snow AGAIN, and the need to gather and get ready for the trek west.

What was involved in the succession crisis

The main contenders were Sidney Rigdon (guardian), Emma who felt the 12 had no authority in the Stake of Nauvoo, the Quorum of the 12, the Council of 50, and then the long stretches like Strang, and Lyman Wight, Cutler. I think we will do a few what if questions and see where they take us, for example “What if Sidney Rigdon had become guardian what would have happened.

The Nauvoo Temple experience

This is perhaps the strangest element of the whole episode and no one calls attention to it. Here their prophet has been killed, they are directly threatened by mob violence on all sides, and what do they do? Well, of course, the only logical thing to do they finish building the temple! It seems like an insane waste of resources at a point in time when they were planning how to move tens of thousands of people west the next year. What were they thinking? How did the Quorum of the 12 manage to get them working on it? What was the reward, the goal, the purpose of building something that would be abandoned within months of completion?

It think this may well be the core of the lesson but how to make it engaging will be the issue. In those few months that the Nauvoo temple was open something like 5000 people completed their own endowments. The temple ran 24 hours per day near the end of the time and people still didn’t want to stop going and start the trek even though the mob violence was now more than just a threat.

So I am going to have build up some resources. This testimony of the importance of the temple ordinances is outstanding. It deserves to be known and celebrated.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Thinking about Gospel Doctrine Lesson 32

This guest post is provided to you by Bill Atkinson from Gospel Doctrine class for Youth. If you’d like to be a guest poster on Our Thoughts, email us at ourthoughts@gmail.com.

“To Seal the Testimony”

As I begin to prepare for this lesson, I am in a bit of a quandary. Clearly the martyrdom of Hyrum and Joseph is one of the key events of this dispensation and very important for the Saints to understand and appreciate. The lesson manual’s purpose—To teach class members about the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph Smith and to strengthen their testimonies of his calling as a prophet of God—needs to be the guiding principle for preparation.

I teach a youth Gospel Doctrine class, and I find the lesson manual is generally inappropriate for this age group. It tends to lead to “teaching” rather than focusing on the students “learning”. So I have a few principles I follow in preparing:

  1. Never attempt to cover the entire lesson. Prayerfully pick the key ideas you think your students need at that point in time. In this case—as I have found since teaching them this summer—they need the historical context, the real sense of why things happened.
  2. Focus on what the students need to learn not on the performance of the teacher. If possible every student should participate actively.

So I am considering focusing the lesson around verse 3 of D&C 135:

Joseph Smith, the Prophet and Seer of the Lord, has done more, save Jesus only, for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived in it. In the short space of twenty years, he has brought forth the Book of Mormon, which he translated by the gift and power of God, and has been the means of publishing it on two continents; has sent the fulness of the everlasting gospel, which it contained, to the four quarters of the earth; has brought forth the revelations and commandments which compose this book of Doctrine and Covenants, and many other wise documents and instructions for the benefit of the children of men; gathered many thousands of the Latter-day Saints, founded a great city, and left a fame and name that cannot be slain. He lived great, and he died great in the eyes of God and his people; and like most of the Lord’s anointed in ancient times, has sealed his mission and his works with his own blood; and so has his brother Hyrum. In life they were not divided, and in death they were not separated!

We will look at and read the scripture with the idea that each person will think about what they consider to be Joseph’s most important contribution and express their ideas as to why that is so.

As class members share these insights, as appropriate, I am going to fold into the discussion the basic historical context of why the martyrdom happened, which the lesson really doesn’t consider:

  1. The simple gathering of the Saints to one place in such numbers giving both economic and political influence
  2. Plural marriage capping the sense that the Mormons were too strange to tolerate
  3. The destruction of the Nauvoo Expositor
  4. Joseph’s presidential campaign
  5. Continued Missouri attempts to get at Joseph
  6. Apostates stirring up people with newspaper articles, particularly John C. Bennett

So that is the starting point for thinking. I think I might dig up an excerpt from the Nauvoo Expositor, so class members can see the kind of thing that was being written by William Law, and see if I can find one of John C. Bennett’s articles that were appearing in various papers at the time.

I started the blog Youth Gospel Doctrine Class, which has some of the lessons from June to August since I have been working as the main substitute teacher. I was, in fact, finally called to teach the class this past Sunday.

So what do you think? Any ideas on what directions to go with adult classes? How many of you are teaching Gospel Doctrine right now?

Popularity: 2% [?]

What’s health care really like in Canada?

This guest post is provided to you by Johnna Cornett, an Our Thoughts reader living in California. If you’d like to be a guest poster on Our Thoughts, email us at ourthoughts@gmail.com.

They’re talking about the Canadian health care system all day long on the radio down here in the United States.

frex: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111084018

I’m hearing great anecdotes, like that one reason Canada works is that it has fewer people than California, and that someone couldn’t get health insurance in California because her injuries treated for free in Canada (hit by a car while she was on her bicycle) were considered a pre-existing condition in the States.

And I find, I’m really no closer to understanding what the Canadian health care system is really like. On one hand, I’m hearing a lot of stories about waiting four months to see a primary care physician, and long waits to have one’s cancer treated, hospital beds in halls, or 19th-century style 20 beds to a room. On the other hand, I’m hearing about the peace of mind of being able to see a doctor whether you’ve changed jobs, to get health care whether or not you have a pre-existing condition. I’m hearing it’s easier to start a business if healthcare is not one of the overheads.

I had a baby when my husband was between jobs. We lost our COBRA coverage though a paperwork error, and then I couldn’t be insured because I was pregnant. Pretty big consequence for paperwork. So I’ve had a baby on a cash basis, knowing I had no way to cover the expenses if my child was born with any complications. I don’t think I really got what it was like to be uninsured until it happened to me. I don’t think I understood the difficulty of getting insurance once you’re in that class of uninsured. And I thought the health insurance paperwork was bad enough when I was family-of-an-employee.

So, you LDS Canadian insiders, what is it really like getting health care in Canada?

Do you have to be clever at navigating bureaucracy to get care? To see a doctor you respect? It’s not atypical here to have to fight the paperwork fight when your insurance decides something wasn’t covered. What’s the analogy there?

And does the Canadian system have challenges when you’re LDS?

Do they give you a hard time about having lots of children? (Actually, that’s happened to me in California.) Do you worry about resources going to abortions? Is care being withheld from the elderly?

Popularity: 2% [?]

Leaving the Church

This is a guest post by Lynn Stevens of Edmonton.

Once familiar with the entire range of issues relative to actually leaving the Church, several key issues seem virtually universal in all these forums!

  1. Most strive to merely defend their personal resolve here! That much, is quintessentially normal!
  2. Problematically, people spend endless time nipping at the branches; and not even seemingly capable of looking at the roots of any real evil.

Almost everyone, for starters, has a slightly different reason for both joining and leaving the LDS church. The old clich?ɬ stereotyping about “apostates” and also the “LDS apologists” is just that! Experienced people (who have really been shafted by the official church) rarely leave only because of the history debates. For instance, I literally was abandoned by the church, illegally and fraudulently; violating both civil rights statutes and the protective guarantee process, outlined by Joseph Smith in the doctrine and covenants. For over 20 years as a convert and returned missionary, .I thought this was categorically impossible! I heard it said on television that “people leave the church;” the church never leaves the people! Sadly, this is simply not true!

People really do get “shafted” by those leaders they gave their souls to, .not all these claims are lies or distorted rhetoric! The silly concept of being “offended” is another “blame the victim” trick that does far more harm than good to utter. Clever people see right through that like a polished window.

I could have sued the church for a lot of money; but declined to pursue that and other options! I have made my peace and forgiveness, so why am I writing this? It is because of the following LDS malaise.

My saddest disappointment is with the pretentious duplicity of the very leaders I loved and worked hard with for 23 years. (The chief leaders in Utah; and in high positions) over the years, the church hierarchy only became more unreasonably strict; and they made sure that they were almost impossible to contact, write or email on the internet (as it developed).

I understand how and why this could happen honestly and justifiably, to a point. However, I ask, quite simply. If Jesus Christ was sitting at a boardroom table in downtown salt lake city, would he make sure that no member of his church could contact him over the gravest of Mormon injustice? The irony is here that the faith is in more trouble over my false membership removal if the church is “true” rather than apocryphal, which I now permanently believe!) Yes, there are many decent Mormons and, of course, it is false to say you do not believe in Christ! However, it is just as silly to fire-brand to the “666″ ranch all who leave the church (being destined for the flames of hell; and all of it, of course, provided by a just, loving and merciful heavenly father).

There is a lot of non-intellectual disrespect in both camps of this issue. I would not tell a happy Mormon to “leave the church”. I also would not tell any who have left that they will be “automatically” happier if they return. This kind of advice suggests that one has the answers for someone he or she does not even know!

The first presidency, general and local leaders are the chief reason why you are in a seemingly unprecedented public relations disaster! Keeping people from being truly honest is that church-created “fear”; one I let rule my conscience unwisely for 2 decades! An honest, deserved criticism of a high-ranking leader or temporary “policy” is tantamount to a greased slide to outer darkness! Believe me, I know the fear; and it reflects a “house built on sand mentality!” if you really are strong and true, you can take and learn from the criticism! I appear, right now, like a moderate neo-hippy with beard, long hair and all that fearful stuff! Yet, I guarantee you, even as a supposed “non-member”, I could write more sensitive “official” replies to LDS directed complaints! Diplomacy and true wisdom will always trump being “stonewalled” or getting some computer-generated letter fired back by a “yes-man” (who really couldn’t care less if you dropped dead in an hour!)

Some of you will point out that this horrendous piece of unrighteous, alleged dominion can be easily corrected.

However, I could not even start to be “owned” by the church again after being literally forced out; and so insidiously refused any and all meaningful contact and explanation about this phony “request” (for membership removal) I did not make any such affirmative demand!

Retroactively, I had a solemn mockery made of 23 years of my life. It was not a church court or an excommunication. It was an intentional lazy effort to get a person?ǨѢs name off the church records! Righteousness, in such high matters is not supposed to be like rolling the dice. Yes, there is an appeal process endowed with sound jurisprudence. However; just wait until you try to access any of these people! It will be a real eye-opener. I promise you! I do not pursue this as a hobby because I think it ends up being unhealthy if one does.

I am willing to respond to emails, if I have time and feel they could be productive. Sadly for the church in both the US and Canada, I think you have needlessly lost some of your most dedicated converts and have not really learned a blessed thing! This abomination occurred nine years ago and I have never even received a letter explaining why this happened! I thank god that Christ will judge me; because with friends like Mormon bureaucrats, I apparently have no need for enemies! You may use my name; but it now stays off the membership rolls. I am not applying for re-instatement!

Popularity: 1% [?]

I Always Suspected I Was Adopted

This is a guest post submitted by David T.

A friend, son of a former temple president, once shared something with me his father suggested to him, and I still mull over the implications.

“You know how before we came to this earth, we were all brothers and sisters, children of our Heavenly Father?”

Uh-huh.

“We were brothers and sisters to our parents, our grandparents and our children.”

Right.

“Well, once our missions on earth are over and we go back, do you think that dynamic has changed? That suddenly we’re parents and children to our brothers and sisters?”

Um . . . I don’t know.

“Well, this isn’t official, but doesn’t it make sense that once we go back, remembering everything, we’ll be brothers and sisters like before?”

What about families are forever?

“Let’s put it this way: In this earth life, we need each other to get back as close to Heavenly Father as we can ?Ǩ you can’t get there alone. But when you die, it’s going to be just you and the Lord there when you’re looking at your life.”

Okay.

“I don’t know. Just don’t be surprised if you’re still close to your parents and ancestors and children, but that the family structure you understand here might not be the same there.”

Every once in a while, a curve ball like that whizzes past me and makes me stop and think. Do I believe what he told me? I know him well enough to believe that’s what his father told him, and I believe if his father’s dwelling on it, there might be something to it. Does it affect my testimony? Not detrimentally. Does it change my opinion of the Plan of Salvation? A little, but not in such a way that it alters my behaviour or direction. When my friend first told this to me it was almost as if my perception was re-focused to a stronger clarity. I’m not saying I had a revelation, but I felt “empowered” and that feeling strengthened my testimony.

This is what the gospel does to me. Not often enough for my liking, and not causing me to go off into evangelical callisthenics (see “chicken dance”). But every once in a while, it provides me with a little surprise that edifies me and reaffirms my loyalty.

Popularity: 1% [?]