Deprecated: Function jetpack_form_register_pattern is deprecated since version jetpack-13.4! Use Automattic\Jetpack\Forms\ContactForm\Util::register_pattern instead. in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Deprecated: Hook site-logo is deprecated since version 13.4! Use custom-logo instead. Jetpack no longer supports site-logo feature. Add custom-logo support to your theme instead: https://developer.wordpress.org/themes/functionality/custom-logo/ in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home2/hotpeppe/public_html/ourthoughts/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831
{"id":4244,"date":"2023-10-08T17:26:17","date_gmt":"2023-10-08T23:26:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ourthoughts.ca\/?p=4244"},"modified":"2023-10-08T17:42:50","modified_gmt":"2023-10-08T23:42:50","slug":"is-exaltation-reserved-for-just-straight-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ourthoughts.ca\/2023\/10\/08\/is-exaltation-reserved-for-just-straight-people\/","title":{"rendered":"Is exaltation reserved for just straight people?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In General Conference last weekend, there were two talks that connected exaltation to marriage between a man and a woman: Dallin Oaks in the first session<\/a> and Russell Nelson in the final session<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I found the citations they used to justify their homophobic restrictions intriguing, and I thought I\u2019d take a look at their statements here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, Oaks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

God\u2019s plan, founded on eternal truth, requires that exaltation can be attained only through faithfulness to the covenants of an eternal marriage between a man and a woman in the holy temple<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Then Nelson:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The Lord has clearly taught that only men and women who are sealed as husband and wife in the temple, and who keep their covenants, will be together throughout the eternities.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s interesting how strong the language is in both quotes. Oaks says that God\u2019s plan requires<\/em> that exaltation comes only to a man and a woman who are married in the temple (through their faithfulness). Nelson claims that the Lord clearly<\/em> taught that \u201ctogether forever\u201d only comes to a husband and a wife sealed in the temple.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requires.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Clearly taught.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those are confident choices. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The problem, however, is that there is absolutely no scriptural evidence for these claims. And the scriptural sources they cite don\u2019t support their argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oaks, for example, cites two scriptures: 1 Corinthians 11:11 and Doctrine and Covenants 132:19\u201320.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s 1 Cor. 11:11:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Paul is not talking about eternal marriage in this passage. Let\u2019s look at the surround verses for context:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

You see, this passage isn\u2019t talking about eternal marriage or exaltation in the celestial kingdom. Rather, it\u2019s discussing the interdependence of men and woman in a relationship. I mean, technically, he\u2019s not even saying \u201chusband\u201d and \u201dwife\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, let\u2019s look at D&C 132:19\u201320<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

19 And again, verily I say unto you, if a man marry a wife by my word, which is my law, and by the new and everlasting covenant, and it is sealed unto them by the Holy Spirit of promise, by him who is anointed, unto whom I have appointed this power and the keys of this priesthood; and it shall be said unto them\u2014Ye shall come forth in the first resurrection; and if it be after the first resurrection, in the next resurrection; and shall inherit thrones, kingdoms, principalities, and powers, dominions, all heights and depths\u2014then shall it be written in the Lamb\u2019s Book of Life, that he shall commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, and if ye abide in my covenant, and commit no murder whereby to shed innocent blood, it shall be done unto them in all things whatsoever my servant hath put upon them, in time, and through all eternity; and shall be of full force when they are out of the world; and they shall pass by the angels, and the gods, which are set there, to their exaltation and glory in all things, as hath been sealed upon their heads, which glory shall be a fulness and a continuation of the seeds forever and ever.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

20 Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore shall they be from everlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be gods, because they have all power, and the angels are subject unto them.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

This passage only says that if<\/em> a man marries a wife they shall receive exaltation and glory in all things. Granted, it has a few prequisites:<\/p>\n\n\n\n